Get full access to one story every week, and to summaries of all other stories. Just create a free account

Business school + offline exams = Covid!😷

The Indian Institute of Management Indore is experiencing a Covid outbreak. One that could’ve been avoided.

This is edition 253 of Beyond The First Order, a premium daily newsletter that demystifies the hidden models, incentives and consequences of the most significant events across India and Southeast Asia

A 🔒 paid newsletter that demystifies the hidden models, incentives and consequences of the most significant events across India and Southeast Asia. Someone sent you this? Subscribe to BFO

Good morning,

There’s a new Covid hotspot and we bring you the deets. Where? Here’s a hint: it’s at one of India’s premier business schools. Talk about (mis)management! 

India’s provident fund has already seen a couple of amendments since the Budget was announced on 1 February. And the latest tweak favours government employees over private sector ones. 

The future of protection against catastrophes like the pandemic could increasingly involve public-private partnerships. A volcano bond is the latest example.

Everyone wants the vaccine. So, the best way to do it is to put a brake on exports. It’s happening everywhere.

And going back to India’s premier business schools, have you listened to the latest episode of our podcast, Unofficial Sources, yet? It’s about the wicked problems they’re being forced to confront. 

IIM-Indore’s exam fever

The second Covid wave is bad news for everyone. But especially for places of learning. We’re at the cusp of a new school year starting. 

The online system, for all its sophistication, is juuuust not holding up. I’m not even talking about remote, low-resourced institutes. I’m talking about the Indian Institute of Management in the city of Indore.

The Ken has learnt that about 15 people on the IIM-I campus have tested positive for Covid. Another 40-50 are under quarantine. The trace-track-test process has been patchy at best, and students are now scared that more asymptomatic peers might be walking around, sharing food, rooms, bathrooms with them.

Is this an uncommon situation? Not really. Campuses across the country have opened and shut because of localised outbreaks. But at IIM-I, argue sources on campus, the outbreak could have been plainly avoided.

You see, sometime in January 2021, students were asked to come back to campus. One of the major reasons for this was that online exams were not working out. At all. IIM-I’s been using an online software to take exams, and long story short, it failed to stop widespread cheating. The institute had apparently asked parents to even set up mirrors in the room with the learning apparatus, to catch instances of cheating. Sure, mirrors are so hard to beat. Anyway, the parents weren’t too impressed. 

(screengrab of email sent by a parent to the Institute)

This was January. Cut to late March, and sources tell The Ken that the institute isn’t giving out any information, other than students can leave as soon as they finish their exams. On campus.

“Why couldn’t these exams be converted to assignments?” asked one teacher, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “ The authorities aren’t really talking. So students don’t know who to turn to. Last year, we couldn’t prepare. This time, it was a really predictable problem.”

The stringent rules on quarantining, on campus, have also deterred students from getting tested, even if they have symptoms. They just want to write their exams and get off the campus. The lack of communication from the authorities, say sources, has only intensified the pressure-cooker-like conditions.

As the second wave makes its way through India, larger institutes have to be geared up for more localised outbreaks if they are serious about getting students back on campus. And the least they can do is be prepared for round two.

Dampened hopes in the EPF

Hoping against hope
Many EPF hopes saw a crash
The change, limited in scope
Scuttled the expected bash

From Rs 2.5 lakh to 5 lakh
The FM raised the bar
But the kindness has a lack
Not all employees are at par

So, if your employer gives
To your EPF account
The 2.5 lakh limit lives
Taxing the interest fount

Last week, India’s Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman flattered to deceive. 

An amendment eased a Budget 2021 provision on the employees’ provident fund (EPF) that had earlier caused much hand-wringing. But the relief was limited in its scope, and the joy fleeting for most. 

Here’s why. 

The Budget, presented on 1 February, had some devils hidden in its details—as always. One of them said that, from April 2021, if your contribution as an employee to provident funds exceeds Rs 2.5 lakh a year (US$3,450), you will have to pay tax on the interest earned on the excess contribution. This was a blow to many, especially high-income earners. That’s because, so far, the interest on contribution to EPF was exempt from tax—without limits. 

Employees generally contribute 12% of their Basic Salary (Basic) and Dearness Allowance (DA) each month to their EPF account, and employers make a matching contribution. The interest earned on these was fully exempt from tax, making it a nifty fixed-income investment. Not only was the interest rate on EPF higher than most other comparable instruments, it was also most tax-efficient. Some employees also use the voluntary provident fund (VPF) route to ramp up their EPF contribution—this allows them to invest big sums, over and above their usual 12% contribution; employers don’t contribute to VPF.

The government finally decided to plug this unlimited largesse in the recent Budget. It did this by taxing interest on employee contributions in excess of Rs 2.5 lakh a year to the EPF, whether by way of regular contribution or through the VPF. 

This caused a hue and cry. A cap is justified, the nay-sayers agreed, but the limit of Rs 2.5 lakh was too low, they said. Many employees use the EPF to build their retirement nest, it was argued. The Finance Minister, while defending the provision, also hinted at the possibility of increasing the limit.

And she did increase the limit last week to Rs 5 lakh (US$6,900) a year in the amendments to the Budget. But there is a catch. The revised limit of Rs 5 lakh is applicable only in cases where the employer is not making any contribution to the provident fund. So, the higher limit benefit will apply only to a limited number of cases—essentially government employees who contribute to the general provident fund (GPF) or such, where the employer (the government) does not contribute. The government’s contribution, in these cases, goes to the pension fund of employees, says this report in the Economic Times.

In short, the Rs 2.5 lakh limit stays for all employees, including the private sector, whose employer also contributes to the EPF. 

Now, this distinction seems unfair to employees in cases where the employer contributes to the EPF, but only a small amount. The law allows employees and employees to contribute just Rs 1,800 (US$25) a month to the EPF—assuming monthly Basic and DA of Rs 15,000 (US$207), even if the employee earns much more. Many employers do have such salary structures. In such cases, it may be just right to allow employees the higher limit of Rs 5 lakh, considering both employee and employer contributions. 

But this will need another amendment. In the next Budget, maybe? Hope springs eternal in the employee’s heart. 

The dystopian future involves financial gains from human suffering

Last week saw a new entrant into the bond markets—a volcano bond. 

It’s part of what’s called catastrophe bonds or ‘CAT bonds’ if you prefer. They’re created to provide financial protection against natural disasters. A company (usually insurers) issues a CAT bond to investors, and promises to pay interest on the bonds regularly. If the disaster it’s trying to protect itself from unfolds, the issuer keeps the money and the investor loses the principal.

An example is a pandemic bond. 

A concoction created by the World Bank in 2017, the US$320 million deal was meant to funnel private-sector money quickly to poor countries in cases of pandemics or epidemics—like Ebola. The idea was proposed immediately after an annual gathering of policymakers in Davos, Switzerland.

But according to Clare Wenham, assistant professor in global health policy at the London School of Economics, these bonds weren’t really on the side of global health security. Rather, it favoured private sector investors. 

In July 2020, Financial Times reported that,

After Covid-19 triggered the payout this year, the World Bank announced it had allocated $195.8m — which included the bonds and related swaps — to 64 eligible countries. Allocations were based on population size, reported cases and whether nations were deemed to be particularly fragile or conflict-affected.

The highest available sum, of $15m, went to Nigeria and Pakistan. Meanwhile, investors holding the bonds — including Baillie Gifford, Amundi and Stone Ridge Asset Management — had received interest payments that totalled almost $100m by the end of February.

So, the payouts were delayed, and investors had already received a very high interest payout from the bonds. 

The problem was stringent conditions that would trigger a payout were favourable to the private investors (the big institutions). You see the problem, and it’s quite typical of most things in finance.

Anyway, back to the volcano bonds or a ‘volcano parametric catastrophe bond’.

Its story of how “It All Started Around A Table In Zurich, Switzerland…” (another Swiss city) seems like it’s another bond to be circumspect about. And just like the pandemic bonds, this also is another public-private partnership. The public entity, in this case, is the Danish Red Cross.

The payout is based on a quantitative model that’s supposed to predict where funds will be needed based on the height of an ash cloud following a volcanic eruption and prevailing winds. The bond will cover 10 volcanoes.

You can expect the payout structure for this to be convoluted too. The private investors will obviously receive high returns for the risk they’re taking. And the triggers that force a payout could favour the private investors and significantly limit their losses.

The unfortunate part is that the future of catastrophe protection could move increasingly towards public-private partnerships as governments use this as their fail-safe, and focus their spending efforts elsewhere. 

As Susan Erikson, a Professor of Global Health in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University in Canada, wrote, “Let’s reckon with living in worlds where it may be necessary to translate the ethical obligation to help those who are suffering into financial devices that make people money, a trend we are clearly in the initial stages of.”

PS: The World Bank cancelled its plans for a second pandemic bond in 2020.

Me first

Before you start fulfilling orders overseas, you better fulfil the local orders first. This is what vaccine makers are discovering, as countries restrict exports in a bid to ensure that enough doses are secured for themselves. 

The European Union is barring AstraZeneca from exporting its vaccine out of the EU until it can fulfil the bloc’s own orders. Things got desperate enough for the bloc to raid the pharma company’s Italian factory only to accept that the doses there were for distribution to customers including the EU. The US has also implemented something similar, cornering the market on locally manufactured vaccines, essentially restricting any export until the country has had its share. These moves leave countries with no domestic vaccine production at a disadvantage.

This could push a shift from relying on outsourced vaccine production in the future and bring it back domestically. Some countries like the UK and Australia have already started this process. In the future, it seems that onshoring will be the way to go for vaccine production, or risk being the last in line for a dose.

That’s a wrap for today.

Don’t forget to write in with your thoughts and observations on how this pandemic is reshaping businesses, societies, and economies. We will be back tomorrow.

Stay safe,
[email protected]

Subscribe to read this story

The Ken is the only business subscription you need. Questions?



  • 5 original and reported longform business stories every week
  • Access to ONLY India edition
  • Close to 250 exclusive stories every year
  • Full access to over 5 years of paywalled stories
  • Pick up to 5 premium subscriber newsletters
  • 4 original and reported longform business stories each week
  • Access to ONLY Southeast Asia edition
  • Close to 200 exclusive stories every year
  • Full access to all paywalled stories since March 2020
  • Pick up to 5 premium subscriber newsletters

Rs. 2,750 /year

$ 120 /year

India Edition
Subscribe Subscribe
Most Asked For


  • 8 original and reported longform business stories each week
  • Access to both India and Southeast Asia editions
  • Close to 400 exclusive stories every year
  • Full access to over 5 years of paywalled stories across India and Southeast Asia
  • Unlimited access to all premium subscriber newsletters
  • Visual Stories

Rs. 4,200 /year



  • 8 original and reported longform business stories each week
  • Access to both India and Southeast Asia editions
  • Close to 400 exclusive stories every year
  • Full access to over 5 years of paywalled stories across India and Southeast Asia
  • Unlimited access to all premium subscriber newsletters
  • Visual Stories
  • Bonus annual gift subscription
  • Priority access to all new products and features

Rs. 8,474 /year



What kind of subscription plans do you offer?

We have three types of subscriptions
- Premium which gives you access to either the India or the Southeast Asia edition.
- Borderless which gives you complete access to The Ken across both editions
- Echelon which gives you complete access to The Ken across both editions along with a bonus gift subscription

What do I get if I subscribe?

The Premium edition gives you access to stories in that edition along with any five subscriber-only newsletters of your choice.

The Borderless and Echelon subscription gives you complete access to The Ken across editions and unlimited access to as many newsletters as you like.

What topics do you usually write about?

We publish sharp, original and reported stories on technology, business and healthcare. Our stories are forward-looking, analytical and directional — supported by data, visualisations and infographics. We use language and narrative that is accessible to even lay readers. And we optimise for quality over quantity, every single time.

Our specialised subscriber-only newsletters are written by our expert, award-winning journalists and cover a range of topics across finance, retail, clean energy, cryptocurrency, ed-tech and many more.

How many newsletters do you have?

We are constantly adding specialised subscriber-only newsletters all the time. All of these are written by our team of award-winning journalists on a specialised topic.

You can see the list of newsletters that we publish over here.

Does a Premium subscription to your Indian edition get me access to the Southeast Asia edition? Or vice-versa?

Afraid not. Each edition is separate with its own subscription plan. The India edition publishes stories focused on India. The Southeast Asia edition is focused on Southeast Asia. We may occasionally cross-publish stories from one edition to the other.

We recommend the Borderless or the Echelon Plan which will give you access to stories across both editions.

Do you have a mobile app?

Yes! We have a top-rated mobile app on both iOS and Android which allows you to read on-the-go and has some amazing features like the ability to bookmark stories, save on your device, dark mode, and much more. It’s really the best way to read The Ken.

Is there a free trial?

You can sign up for a free account to experience The Ken and understand our products better. We’ll send you some free stories and newsletters occasionally, and you can access our archive of previously published free stories. You can stay on the free account as long as you’d like.

The vast majority of our stories, articles and newsletters can be accessed only by a paid subscription.

Do you offer any discounts?

Sorry, no. Our journalism is funded completely by our subscribers. We believe that quality journalism comes at a price, and readers trust and pay us so that we can remain independent.

Do you offer refunds?

No. We allow you to sample our journalism for free before signing up, and after you do, we stand by its quality. But we do not offer refunds.

I am facing some trouble purchasing a subscription. What can I do?

Just write to us at [email protected] with details. We’ll help you out.

I have a few more questions. How can I reach out to you?

Sure. Just email us at [email protected] or follow us on Twitter.