Sundar Pichai, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg—meet Margrethe Vestager, Lina Khan and Dina Srinivasan.

Vestager is the European Union’s (EU) competition commissioner; Khan, a law student in her late twenties; and Srinivasan, a veteran ad-tech entrepreneur. Three women, one goal: dismantle the dominance of Big Tech. Vestager, Khan and Srinivasan have decoded Pichai’s Google, Bezos’s Amazon and Zuckerberg’s Facebook, respectively, to isolate the same antitrust DNA that runs through all these companies. All laid bare in the form of explosive research papers and orders.

These ideas—Srinivasan’s February paper on Facebook’s market dominance and privacy issues leading to lower quality of service, Vestager’s multiple rulings and multi-billion euro fines against Google and Khan’s 2017 article examining Amazon’s predatory pricing—are leading to a groundswell of action the world over.

At least 10 different regulators in different countries are probing at least one of the three companies for antitrust violations. Including, most recently, the US Federal Trade Commission, which is considering fining Facebook up to $5 billion over privacy violations.

In India, however, these ideas are still ricocheting off the walls of the antitrust watchdog, the Competitive Commission of India or CCI.

“The CCI so far is being pro-industry in its stance,” said a lawyer specialising in antitrust cases. She asked not to be named as she is not an authorised spokesperson for her firm. “They are watching what is happening globally, but there is this understanding that India is in an early phase of the digital economy, and the CCI doesn’t want to scuttle it.”

For example, the CCI was taken to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in January by a union of 3,500 online sellers. For dismissing a case they had filed against Flipkart, complaining that the Walmart-owned e-commerce firm abused its dominant position in online retail. The CCI said it hadn’t.

“We have challenged the impugned order before the NCLAT, because contrary to the Hon’ble Commission’s opinion, we feel we presented reasonable evidence to prove the case of dominance,” says Chanakya Basa, an antitrust lawyer who argued for the All India Online Vendors Association. The NCLAT is set to hear the appeal next week. Its decision could set a new precedent for competition law in India.

The one thing Facebook, Amazon, and Google have in common is their ability to use their size and adjacencies to trample over the competition. What may be a whole business for another company is just a feature for these three. The companies’ network effects create switching costs and erect barriers to entry or expansion. That’s why venture capitalists’ favourite question to ask before investing is “What will you do if Google, Facebook or Amazon decide to do this”—a measure of competitive fear.

AUTHOR

Arundhati Ramanathan

Arundhati is Bengaluru-based. She is interested in how people use money in the digital age and how new economies will take shape based on that interaction. She has spent over 10 years reporting and writing on various subjects. Previous stints were at Mint, Outlook Business and Reuters.

View Full Profile

Enter your email address to read this story

To read this, you’ll need to register for a free account which will also give you access to our stories and newsletters