Okay, so last week’s edition of The Nutgraf went a little viral. So, chances are you are new here and have no idea what to expect. Here’s what you need to know:
- The Nutgraf is your weekly newsletter that provides context and helps you decode the most significant events around business, technology and healthcare in India (mostly).
- I try to make complex things simple. Expect a lot of bad jokes and memes. Partly because this is my only marketable skill. Partly because most of my target audience is hungover while reading this on Saturday morning.
- If you got this as a PDF on WhatsApp, just sign-up here. It’s free. You’ll get it in your inbox. Much more convenient. Tell your friends too. To read better stuff written by actual journalists, just subscribe to The Ken.
Now, let’s dive in.
IRCTC’s light at the end of the tunnel
There’s a company in India called the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC).
If you have ever lived in India, chances are you have used IRCTC at least once. That’s because IRCTC is an exclusive partner to the Indian Railways, and handles online ticketing, catering and a bunch of other products and services.
I don’t have to tell you why being an exclusive partner to the world’s largest train network is a big deal.
Last week, IRCTC went for an IPO (Initial Public Offering), and listed itself on the Bombay Stock Exchange.
How did it go?
- The stock opened just over 100% higher than its issue price of Rs 320 ($ 4.5)
- Not content, it then jumped another 16% to touch a high of Rs 744 ($ 10.47)
- It was the biggest listing gain for any company in India in nearly two years.
So… pretty good, right?
Depends. Nearly everyone is happy. Except one.
The Indian Railways.
Who are quite, quite miffed.
Let’s find out. To do this, let’s use a technique called the 5 Whys. It’s a method popularised by Toyota to improve problem solving, where we will ask ‘why’ five times until we figure out an answer.
Why do an IPO?
IRCTC is an unusual company. First, it’s a PSU (Public Sector Unit), a three-letter acronym that basically means it’s run by the government of India. PSUs generally have a reputation in India—the popular perception is that they are dinosaurs that are hugely overstaffed, over-leveraged and heavily loss-making.
Not IRCTC though.
- First, it has quite a growth curve. It earned a total revenue of Rs 1,956 crore ($295 Mn) in the year ended March 2019, up 25% from the previous year.
- It also makes money. IRCTC’s operating profit grew 25% to Rs 430 crore ($65 Mn) in the same period.
- It’s fairly innovative. IRCTC launched online ticketing back in 2002, well before e-commerce went mainstream in India.
Now, the Indian government needs funds. To get some of these funds, it does something called disinvestment. This is where it sells off stakes in assets it owns in exchange for money. There’s a target every year. For this year, the targeted disinvestment is Rs 1,05,000 crore (~ $15 Bn). This is up from Rs 80,000 crore last year.
Oh, also, all the proceeds from an IPO go to the government rather than the company.
Tax revenues are down. The economy isn’t in great shape. That’s why the IRCTC is looking more attractive for the government. It has even been pretty ambitious about it. Take this Economic Times story from back in 2015:
“We are trying to exploit the site. Our growth will come from there. We have been asked by the government to grow like Flipkart,” chairman and managing director AK Manocha told ET.
Grow like Flipkart.
A government company.
What justifies this? What makes IRCTC so attractive?
In other words…
The best person to answer this question is the IRCTC itself.
Here’s what IRCTC, in its IPO filing prospectus, says:
Monopolies make for a great business model. Investors love monopolies.
Hilariously, IRCTC positions this as a risk. Because it goes on to say, ‘if the Government were to allow open competition in all or any of these areas, it may impact our financial results’
This monopoly position has benefited IRCTC enormously. Just look at their revenue streams.
Look at the change in its mix of revenue. IRCTC’s revenue has moved away from internet ticketing—which is fast becoming a commodity with thin margins, to high-margin business lines like Catering, License Fees and Tourism. All way up in the value chain.
Plus even the little things count. For instance, did you know that IRCTC is the only entity that’s authorised to manufacture and distribute packaged drinking water at all railway stations and on trains?
Sales from water contribute 10% of IRCTC’s revenue. In fact, IRCTC’s market share in packaged drinking water is 45%. In India.
(Pause to allow the Indian government to laugh loudly at Softbank)
I could go on, but if you want to know more about IRCTC and how it uses this monopoly to influence payment companies, you should read Arundhati’s stellar story here. Really is one of the best out there.
That’s why when IRCTC listed itself for an IPO, it was oversubscribed a whopping 112 times and made it one of the most sought after IPOs in the history of PSU IPOs.
Which made the Indian Railways really unhappy.
Why is Indian Railways unhappy?
I’ll explain, but first, it’s important to understand how pricing is determined at the time of IPO listing.
Now, my knowledge of corporate finance is woefully inadequate. That’s why I am in a media startup while my B-school batchmates own sea-facing apartments at Nepean Sea Road in Mumbai. So I’ll let Matt Levine, Bloomberg Opinion columnist and writer of the second best newsletter in the world – ‘Money Stuff’, explain it:
The way initial public offering pricing works is that investors want to buy stock in a new company at a low price, and the company wants to sell it at a high price, and an investment bank listens to both sides’ arguments and then tells the company what price it can sell the stock at, and the company generally does what the bank tells it to do. And then it sells the stock and it usually goes up like 10% or 20% or even more the next day. This is called the “IPO pop,” and it happens in most IPOs, though of course not all of them: IPOs are inherently risky investments, and sometimes they go down, and several very high-profile recent IPOs have “cracked” immediately and stayed below their IPO prices. But if there is a pop, and there usually is, it suggests that the investors might have been willing to pay a bit more than they let on, and that the bankers were maybe a bit conservative in their advice to the company. Over and over again.
I happen to think that there are good reasons for this system, and that it mostly works well for companies and their pre-IPO investors. (Which is why it’s been the almost universal way that companies have gone public for many decades.) Companies want good relationships with their shareholders over the long run, so it is nice for them to introduce themselves to the market in a way that makes the market happy. Early investors tend to hold onto their shares for some time after the IPO, so they want the stock to trade well.
Now here’s what happened with IRCTC.
The government wanted to raise Rs 645 crore. Instead, it received bids totalling Rs 72,000 crore.
That’s why the Indian Railways is upset. It could have got way more, but the bankers priced it far too low. As K.R Srivats writes in The Hindu:
Clearly, the Centre and its merchant bankers erred in conservatively pricing the issue. Had they been more aggressive, the disinvestment receipts from the IRCTC offer-for-sale would have been far higher.
Which begs the next question.
Why was IRCTC undervalued?
Look, IPO valuation is more art than science.
But despite that, enough people knew that the IRCTC IPO was vastly undervalued. Equity Analysts told all their clients about it. Nearly every single recommendation from any stock broker I could find recommended a solid buy for IRCTC at this price.
Hell, even students knew the IPO was undervalued. Take Pratik Rathi, a 21-year-old student at BITS Pilani. He runs a blog called Framinc. In it, he mentions that he’s ‘passionate about financial markets’. He even attempted a valuation of IRCTC using a method called Discounted Cash Flow—pretty standard for valuations.
Here’s his most optimistic scenario.
When IRCTC listed, it received a valuation of Rs 11,700 crore. That’s double what IRCTC’s bankers expected. And Rs 1,200 crore (~$180 Mn) above most optimistic calculations.
You know the last question.
Why was the IRCTC IPO so popular?
Here’s what K.S Badrinarayan writes in The Hindu:
Why would they do that?
Probably because there was no better place to accumulate savings.
This is telling of a larger force at play around IRCTC’s IPO. One that explains the overwhelming interest that added Rs. 1,200 crore to IRCTC’s valuation from all categories of investors. Equity investments are usually high-risk high-reward, but what happens when a company like IRCTC with low-risk and high-reward launches an underpriced IPO? Especially in an environment when even banks can’t be trusted with savings? It would be like investing in government bonds, with the upside of an IPO pop.
That’s what makes IRCTC special. Not just the fact that it’s a monopoly, but that it’s a government-run monopoly.
It wasn’t really an IPO.
It was a lottery to get a piece of India’s most lucrative Provident Fund.
India quietly tests its trade power
This section is from Rohin. Who has an interesting point.
America’s National Basketball Association, the NBA, was the latest international organization to bow to the uncompromising and unforgiving power of China’s trade. A single, quickly-deleted tweet in support of Hong Kong’s freedom (the semi-autonomous city that is part of China has been gripped by widespread protests in favour of independence since June) from one of the general managers of its sports teams snowballed into a crisis. A crisis out of which the NBA’s most “woke” players emerged bereft of spine or principles.
That China successfully uses its economic might to force other countries to kowtow to its own political policies is a known thing. That India is slowly starting down that road isn’t.
After Malaysia, one of its strong trading and geopolitical partners, criticised its policy towards the state of Kashmir at the U.N General Assembly, India seems to be testing its ability to retaliate via its trade power. India is the world’s largest importer of palm oil, and Malaysia is the world’s second largest exporter of it. Last year India imported $1.63 billion worth palm oil and products from Malaysia. Then, after an import duty cut in January this year, that figure surged to over $2 billion in just the first 9 months of 2019.
Now, Malaysian palm oil imports to India are tumbling because of expectations that they will be curbed or discouraged, as a message that there will henceforth be an economic cost to opposing India’s positions internationally.
And just like Chinese use of trade power is often accompanied with coordinated citizen action, in India too there was also a social media campaign to “#boycottmalaysia”.
Last Week in Softbank
Since we are discussing IPOs, remember WeWork?
Reports emerged earlier this week that WeWork was fast running out of cash, with just enough cash in hand to last till Thanksgiving. There was a good chance that the company would be bankrupt by the end of the year.
WeWork had two options. First, there’s JP Morgan. Which offered WeWork a $5 billion “junk-debt package”.
Second, there’s SoftBank.
As Bloomberg reported,
SoftBank Group Corp. is assembling a rescue financing plan for WeWork that may value the office-sharing company below $8 billion, according to people familiar with the discussions.
SoftBank, which with its affiliates already owns a little under one-third of WeWork, has been in discussions to provide the company with $5 billion of funding in a mix of equity and debt. The financing would come directly from the Japanese firm, rather than its Vision Fund, a person said earlier this week. SoftBank would not amass a majority of voting rights, though its stake would increase, the person said. Part of the package may include non-voting preferred stock.
$8 Billion dollars.
So let’s get this straight. If this deal goes through, Softbank would have invested ~$15 Billion into a company that’s currently worth…half of that, without majority voting rights in the company. A company, which, let me remind you, Softbank believed was worth $65 Billion five weeks ago.
As Tim Culpan tweeted,
What We Are Listening
This week we did something special.
We created a mixtape.
I asked everyone at The Ken to send me a song they were listening to right now. Think of it as your Diwali playlist… for the weirdest party ever.
You can find the playlist on Spotify here.
Also, here are the songs.
- Abinaya : Maruvaarthai by Sid Sriram
- Arundhati : Know How by Kings of Convenience
- Balan : Big Indian by Dandy Warhols
- Durga : I can’t go on without you by Kaleo
- Iqbal : Hasta rahta hoon aaj kal by Kabir Singh
- Janane : Poraney Poraney (Vaagai Sooda Vaa) by M. Ghibran, Ranjith, Neha Basin
- Jon : Supersonic by Oasis
- Munmun : Bekhayali from Kabir Singh
- Olina : Praise You by Fatboy Slim
- Omar : Rejoicing in Raghuvamsa by Indosoul
- Prajakta : The Warli Revolt by Swadesi
- Pramshu : Federkleid by Faun
- Pranav Shankar : Mama by Jonas Blue
- Pratap : Damadum by Quratulain Balouch
- Ranjan : Day to day (For six days a week) by LA Salami
- Rohin : Vaishnava Jana To by Brodha V
- Ruhi : Kho gaye hum kahan from Baar Baar Dekho
- Sameer : Jagadananda Karaka – Thyagaraja Kriti by TM Krishna
- Savio : Chasing the Sun by Motherjane
- Seema : Brave by Sara Bareilles
- Shreedhar : Treat her right by Roy Head & The Traits
- Suraksha : Senorita by Shawn Mendes and Camila Cabello
- Vandana : Navrai Majhi from English Vinglish
Please feel free to write to respective individuals for questions about their musical preferences (or lack thereof).
Have a wonderful weekend.
And Happy Diwali in advance.
Get The Nutgraf in your inbox
Sign up for a free account